🔗 Share this article

Are your professional networking connections recognizing you as a industry expert? Do numerous commenters applauding your advice on growing your business? Do recruiters reaching out to explore opportunities?

If not, the reason could be your gender.

The Test: Changing Gender Identity to achieve Increased Reach

Numerous women joined an organized LinkedIn experiment this week after viral posts suggested that switching their gender to "male" boosted their network presence.

Other testers modified their profiles to include what they called "masculine-oriented" language - inserting action-focused professional jargon like "propel", "revolutionize" and "expedite". Based on reports, their exposure similarly increased.

Systemic Preference Concerns Raised

The improved metrics has led some to speculate whether an inherent sexism in the platform's system favors men who employ professional networking terminology.

Similar to many large social media platforms, LinkedIn utilizes an algorithm to determine which posts appear to which users - boosting some while reducing others.

Platform Response

In a recent company announcement, LinkedIn recognized the phenomenon but claimed it does not consider "personal characteristics" when determining post visibility. Rather, the company explained that "hundreds of signals" affect how posts are received.

Modifying profile gender on your profile does not affect how your posts appears in search or feed.

Personal Experiences

A social media consultant, who changed her gender identifiers to "he/him" and her name to "Simon E", described remarkable results.

"The statistics I'm observing indicate a 1,600% increase in visitor traffic and a thirteen-fold jump in content views," she noted.

Megan Cornish, a communications strategist, began experimenting after noticing her reach decrease substantially.

The Process

• First, she modified her gender to "male"
• Then, she used AI tools to rephrase her profile using "masculine-oriented" wording
• Finally, she recycled previous content with similar "assertive" language

The result was instantaneous: a 415% increase in visibility within one week.

The Downside

Despite the positive results, Cornish voiced unhappiness with the approach.

"Before, my posts were softer - brief and insightful, but also friendly and human," she stated. "Now, the masculine version was forceful and self-assured - like a white male being overly confident."

She discontinued the test after seven days, saying "Each day I continued, and outcomes improved, I became angrier."

Mixed Results

Some testers experienced favorable results. One writer who changed both her profile gender to "man" and her ethnicity to "Caucasian" described a decrease in visibility and interaction.

"We understand there's systemic preference, but it's very challenging to comprehend how it operates in particular situations or the reasons behind it," she remarked.

Broader Implications

These tests coincide with ongoing discussions about LinkedIn's distinctive position as both a professional network and social space.

Platform modifications in the past few months have reportedly resulted in female creators experiencing significantly reduced exposure, leading to unofficial tests where identical posts by male and female users received dramatically unequal audience engagement.

Technical Explanation

Per LinkedIn, the network uses AI systems to categorize and spread posts based on multiple factors, including post content and the member's career profile.

The company states it frequently assesses its algorithms, including "checks for inequalities based on gender."

Company representative proposed that current reductions in some users' reach might originate from increased competition due to more content on the platform.

Changing Landscape

As one participant observed, "masculine-oriented language" appears to be growing on the network.

"Users typically consider LinkedIn as more businesslike and refined," she remarked. "This is evolving. It's becoming increasingly competitive and unpredictable."