🔗 Share this article

Iran is willing to reinitiate atomic negotiations with Washington provided that it is treated with "dignity" and "honor", Iran's foreign minister has announced.

The Iranian diplomat declared only diplomacy worked, and shared new appeals had been made by intermediaries to resume talks with the American leadership. He said Iran did not have undeclared nuclear sites, and Iran could not yet permit the International Atomic Energy Agency to access bombed nuclear sites for protective measures.

Navigating a Complex Course

Araghchi is walking a difficult path since Iran does not want be perceived to be operating from a stance of disadvantage, and he emphatically stated that Iran had emerged more resilient militarily and psychologically from the coordinated strike on its nuclear sites in June.

He was talking at a security conference in Tehran where he reiterated that Iran had "an inalienable right to refine atomic fuel within its borders that it will never give up" – the key factor of the deadlock in the previous talks.

Previous Discussions Abruptly Terminated

The previous five rounds of negotiations between the US and Iran were ended suddenly and hostile termination on 12 June when Israel, with American backing, targeted Iran's enrichment centers in a two-week conflict that concluded with Donald Trump asserting the locations had been obliterated. Subsequently, EU nations exercised their privilege to restore global restrictions, but Iran maintains they have not had a substantial consequence.

Ideal Resolution Proposed

Iran's diplomats said they felt they had achieved a "perfect agreement" to the nuclear fuel concern in earlier negotiations, when it was agreed an domestic cooperative with American involvement could refine atomic fuel. The two nations would have been able to claim victory since home-based processing would have continued and the US could be certain that Iran's enrichment initiative was solely for peaceful purposes.

It had not been settled in the negotiations that American atomic experts could work within Iranian territory, but that was a logical implication of the partnership suggestion. Representatives stated on multiple occasions they had secured an understanding with the US representative the US official only for the agreement to collapse due to "opponents in the US".

Current Position

Tehran representatives declared the partnership proposal was now no longer available, but it seems very probable the offer could be reintroduced in various formats if discussions restart.

Trump in recent days claimed he had been receiving messages that Iran sought to reopen negotiations, but privately Iran's diplomats state they are not yet obtaining coherent offers from the United States either straightforwardly or from key regional mediators, such as the Qatari government, the Egyptian leadership, Oman and Saudi Arabia. The Tehran's diplomatic corps has been criticized of passivity in the wake of Trump's direct instinctive approach, but Tehran asserts negotiations is not part of a performance.

Negotiating Stance

In his speech to the gathering, intended to portray the US as a hegemonic power that misuses the concept of international law, the foreign minister stated the two-week conflict revealed the dispute could not be ended by military means. He said the assaults began with a American requirement for an complete Tehran capitulation and culminated with an unconditional call for a ceasefire.

Iran is assured the initial Israeli attacks were mounted with complete American awareness and collaboration, making faith hard to rebuild.

Negotiations Stays the Ultimate Resolution

The foreign minister declared: "It was not Iran that had deserted dialogue; it was the United States and the western countries that had always attempted to impose their will during the negotiations. Negotiations can still be active and remains the primary answer to settle disagreements, but its requirements, guidelines and principles must be respected."

"In case they talk to the Iranian people with the approach of dignity and honor, they will obtain a answer in the identical approach."

Restoration and Rebuilding

In what is described by Iranian officials as the conflict of restoration and reconstruction, the foreign minister said he was certain Iran's security strengths "are much stronger than prior to 13 or 14 June of this year. All our capabilities have been restored. We acquired multiple understandings from this war; we have discovered our own weaknesses and the weaknesses of the enemy."

He added: "We managed to survive this war. Our atomic expertise, which they planned to obliterate, remains in place. The installations and equipment, if eliminated, will be restored; what is crucial is the determination of the Iranian people and then the national cohesion that they sought to undermine, but did not succeed to destroy. The Iranian people have grown stronger, more united, and more endorsing of the leadership and the nation in the face of this attack."