🔗 Share this article

Australia's bold action to ban social platforms access for young people below 16 is sparking debate worldwide. Lawmakers, child protection groups, and parents are observing intently to see if this strategy will become a template for the rest of the world.

Across Europe Trend

Across Europe, a growing chorus of states are moving toward parallel measures.

• The Danish government has stated a ban on social media for youth below 15, with the prime minister arguing that mobile devices and networks are "taking away our children's childhood". Legislation could be passed in the coming year.
• The Norwegian government is set to implement a age restriction of 15, citing the need to safeguard children from the "influence of the recommendation systems".
• Ireland is introducing a digital ID system to verify the identity and age of social media participants. Authorities have suggested that an similar ban could be "an tools under consideration".
• In Spain, the prime minister has asked the legislature to pass a proposal increasing the access age for accessing social media to 16.
• In France, the leader has floated the idea of a ban for children below 15, and a government panel has endorsed a comparable action, including an overnight "screen time restriction" for older teenagers.
• The administration in The Dutch government has urged guardians to restrict their youngsters from social media before 15.

For the broader EU, the bloc's legislature has adopted a advisory statement demanding a ban for under-16s except if guardian approval is provided. Even though it warns of the "addictive" design of these services, the move does not enact binding law.

"A clear age restriction is a useful first step," said one MEP behind the initiative.

Britain: A Watchful Eye

For the United Kingdom, the administration has remained open to a possible ban, arguing that "nothing is discarded" but insisting any action must be "supported by strong data".

Earlier, momentum built behind a bill to introduce restrictions on social media use by teenagers, but it was eventually modified. Nonetheless, the government vowed to investigate the matter.

Advocacy groups have voiced concerns. An organization founded by the loved ones of a teenager who died after being exposed to dangerous platform posts argues that a blanket age ban may not make platforms safer and could result in a "sudden drop-off" of exposure when young people turn 16.

"The Australian ban is a reaction to the failure of the social media companies to build products and services that are safe and suitable for children," commented a prominent child protection advocate.

The US: A State-by-State Picture

Across America, regulation is largely unfolding at the state level against a backdrop of federal inaction.

• Utah demands parental consent for minors to use social media and limits nighttime use.
• Florida has passed a law barring under-14s from creating accounts on social media, though it is subject to legal challenges.
• Virginia has passed a law restricting minors to one hour of social media time per day, with additional access requiring a guardian's okay.
• The state of Georgia, Tennessee, and Louisiana have similarly introduced bills mandating adult authorization for minors to create social media presences.

Despite widespread concern and calls from certain individuals to mimic this path, a federal ban is currently seen as a distant prospect.

Worldwide Outlook

Apart from these regions, additional nations are also considering moves.

• Malaysia aims to restrict social media for those under sixteen effective next year.
• The Brazilian authorities has increased the minimum age for one major platform to 16.

However, international agencies adopt a more measured tone. The UN children's agency has warned that social media bans have downsides and "may even backfire". The body points out that social networks can be a "vital connection" for vulnerable children and that regulation should not be a "substitute" for tech companies to improve safety.

Even as this international debate unfolds, the actions of Australia and others indicate that states globally are increasingly content to delay for the industry to self-regulate.